Oz Gentlemen’s Club became the subject of federal wage-and-hour litigation after an exotic dancer challenged how she and other dancers were classified and paid. The Oz Gentlemen’s Club lawsuit centered on allegations involving independent-contractor classification, minimum wages, overtime, tips, and related practices under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA).
People researching the case today often want to know whether a class action remains open, whether a settlement was reached, and whether former workers can submit claims or receive a payout in 2026. Some online descriptions have also mixed wage claims with other workplace allegations that require separate verification.
The federal court record provides a clearer picture. The known case began in 2021, proceeded through arbitration-related activity and individual settlements, and was dismissed with prejudice in November 2023.
What Was the Oz Gentlemen’s Club Lawsuit About?
The federal case was Dale v. Gulf Coast Holdings, LLC d/b/a Oz’s Gentlemen’s Club, Case No. 8:21-cv-2246-CPT, in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division. Destinee Dale brought the action under the FLSA on behalf of herself and others she alleged were similarly situated.
The dispute primarily concerned whether dancers were improperly treated as independent contractors rather than employees entitled to federal wage protections. Dale alleged that the defendants failed to pay required minimum and overtime wages and challenged practices involving kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping.
Importantly, these were allegations raised by the plaintiff. The eventual settlement did not amount to a trial verdict establishing that every allegation was proven.
Was the Case Related to Wages, Worker Classification, or Other Employment Claims?
Yes. The documented federal case was principally a wage-and-hour dispute. Dale alleged that dancers were classified as independent contractors as part of a system that resulted in unpaid minimum wages and overtime compensation.
The complaint also raised federal issues involving kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping. Those claims fit within the broader wage-and-hour dispute rather than establishing a general lawsuit covering every possible workplace complaint.
Which Oz Gentlemen’s Club Entity Was Named in the Case?
The court identified Gulf Coast Holdings, LLC, doing business as Oz’s Gentlemen’s Club, as a defendant. Paul Scagnelli, identified in the order as the club’s owner, was also named as a defendant.
That distinction matters because online references to “Oz Gentlemen’s Club” may use the venue name without identifying the legal business entity involved in the litigation.
Who Filed the Lawsuit and When?
Destinee Dale initiated the federal collective action in September 2021. The case was brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act, which establishes federal protections concerning minimum wage, overtime, and certain employment practices.
Additional dancers later filed consent forms seeking to participate. The parties subsequently notified the court that they intended to arbitrate their dispute, and the federal action was stayed while those proceedings moved forward.
Who Were the Named Plaintiffs?
Destinee Dale was the original plaintiff. Court records also identify Julie Zats, Kaitlyn Roush, Marilyn Maas, Alana McRae, and Skyler Hall in connection with opt-in activity during the litigation.
The procedural history is important because an FLSA collective action does not automatically make every potentially affected worker a plaintiff. Workers generally become parties by filing written consent to opt into the action.
Who Were the Defendants?
The federal order identifies the defendants as Gulf Coast Holdings, LLC d/b/a Oz’s Gentlemen’s Club and Paul Scagnelli. Dale alleged that they were responsible for the employment practices challenged under the FLSA.
The settlement ultimately resolved the participating plaintiffs’ wage-related disputes without a trial determining liability on every allegation.
Where Was the Lawsuit Filed?
The case was filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Tampa Division.
Its federal docket number was 8:21-cv-2246-CPT. The court’s final settlement order was entered by U.S. Magistrate Judge Christopher P. Tuite on November 1, 2023.
What Are the Core Allegations Against Oz Gentlemen’s Club?
The complaint focused on alleged violations of federal wage-and-hour protections. Dale contended that dancers were treated as independent contractors while allegedly performing work under circumstances that should have entitled them to employee protections.
The documented allegations included:
- Misclassification of dancers as independent contractors
- Failure to pay required minimum wages
- Failure to pay overtime wages
- Practices involving alleged kickbacks
- Tip-sharing issues
- Forced-tipping practices
These points describe the plaintiffs’ allegations, not judicial findings of wrongdoing. The case ended through negotiated settlements rather than a merits judgment after trial.
What Employment Practices Were Challenged?
The central practice challenged was the classification and compensation of exotic dancers.
Under the FLSA, simply calling a worker an independent contractor does not necessarily determine legal status. Federal guidance focuses on the economic realities of the relationship and whether a worker is economically dependent on the business or genuinely operating an independent business.
Dale alleged that the dancers should have received protections associated with employee status, including minimum and overtime wages.
Which Allegations Are Supported by Court Records?
The November 2023 federal order specifically confirms allegations concerning independent-contractor classification, unpaid minimum wages, unpaid overtime, kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping.
The order does not establish that the defendants were ultimately found liable for those allegations. Instead, it explains that the parties negotiated settlements after reviewing time sheets and other business records and chose to resolve the disputed claims.
How Did the Worker Misclassification Claims Begin?
The worker-classification dispute arose from Dale’s allegation that Oz’s Gentlemen’s Club treated dancers as independent contractors when, according to her legal theory, their working relationship entitled them to employee protections under the FLSA.
Classification is important because covered employees receive federal minimum-wage and overtime protections, while genuine independent contractors generally fall outside those FLSA employee protections.
Were Dancers Classified as Independent Contractors?
According to Dale’s complaint as summarized by the court, yes. She alleged that she and other dancers were classified as independent contractors.
Her position was that this classification was improper and resulted in dancers not receiving minimum and overtime wages required for covered employees. The defendants’ settlement of the case should not be interpreted as a judicial ruling that the classification was unlawful.
How Do Courts Determine Whether a Dancer Is an Employee?
FLSA classification generally depends on the economic realities of the working relationship rather than only the terminology written into a contract.
The Department of Labor explains that the analysis considers the overall relationship and whether the worker is economically dependent on the employer for work or is instead in business for themselves. No single contractual label automatically controls the result.
Why Does Worker Classification Matter Under the FLSA?
Classification determines whether many core FLSA protections apply.
Covered, nonexempt employees generally must receive at least the applicable minimum wage and overtime compensation for qualifying hours beyond 40 in a workweek. Employers also have recordkeeping obligations covering employee hours and compensation.
A genuine independent contractor does not receive those protections through the FLSA in the same manner.
What Did the Wage Theft Allegations Involve?
The wage allegations concerned whether the dancers received compensation required under federal law after accounting for their classification, working hours, tips, and other payment practices.
Dale specifically alleged unpaid minimum wages and overtime. The complaint also challenged certain practices concerning kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping.
Were Minimum Wage Violations Alleged?
Yes. Failure to pay required minimum wages was one of the central allegations documented by the federal court.
The FLSA generally establishes a federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour for covered, nonexempt employees, although applicable state law may require a higher rate.
Whether a particular worker was legally entitled to that protection depends on factors including employee status and FLSA coverage.
Were House Fees or Tip Practices Challenged?
The court order specifically states that Dale alleged violations of federal prohibitions concerning kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping.
Federal tip rules can restrict an employer’s ability to retain employees’ tips and regulate how tip credits and tip pools operate. The legality of any particular fee or payment arrangement depends on its structure and its effect on legally required wages.
Were Unpaid Overtime Claims Involved?
Yes. Dale alleged that the defendants failed to pay overtime wages to which she and other dancers claimed they were entitled.
Covered, nonexempt employees generally must receive at least one and one-half times their regular rate for hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek.
The lawsuit resolved without a trial determining the defendants’ liability for the overtime allegations.
What FLSA Violations Were at the Center of This Case?
The FLSA issues centered on employee classification, minimum wages, overtime compensation, and tip-related practices.
These issues are interconnected. If a worker who is treated as an independent contractor is legally an employee, wage requirements that the business did not previously apply may become relevant.
What Does the FLSA Require for Minimum Wage?
The FLSA generally requires covered, nonexempt employees to receive at least the federal minimum wage, currently $7.25 per hour. States can establish higher minimum wages, in which case employees may be entitled to the more protective applicable standard.
Special rules can apply to tipped employees, but tips do not simply eliminate an employer’s wage obligations.
How Do FLSA Rules Apply to Tipped Workers?
An employer using the federal tip credit must satisfy specific requirements. The Department of Labor explains that the employer must pay the required direct cash wage and ensure that wages plus qualifying tips reach at least the federal minimum wage.
Employers and managers are also generally prohibited from keeping employees’ tips. Tip pooling and tip-credit arrangements are subject to additional rules.
When Is Overtime Pay Required?
Covered, nonexempt employees generally qualify for overtime after working more than 40 hours in a workweek.
The federal overtime rate must ordinarily be at least one and one-half times the employee’s regular rate. Special calculations can apply where a lawful tip credit is used.
What Records Must Employers Maintain?
Covered employers must maintain records concerning hours and wages for nonexempt employees.
Those records generally include daily and weekly hours, regular pay rates, straight-time earnings, overtime earnings, additions or deductions, total wages, and payment dates. Payroll records generally must be preserved for at least three years, while certain supporting wage-computation records have a two-year retention period.
Were There Sexual Harassment Claims in This Lawsuit?
The verified federal order describing Dale’s lawsuit focuses on wage-and-hour allegations. It discusses minimum wage, overtime, worker classification, kickbacks, tip sharing, and forced tipping.
That record should not be expanded into a sexual-harassment case without separate supporting filings. Online articles may combine allegations from different disputes or make broader claims that are not reflected in the documented FLSA proceeding.
Do Court Records Confirm Sexual Harassment Allegations?
The November 2023 order reviewed for this article does not identify sexual harassment as one of Dale’s claims.
It specifically characterizes the dispute as an FLSA wage case involving dancer classification and compensation practices. Therefore, it would be misleading to present sexual harassment as a confirmed allegation in this particular lawsuit based on that record alone.
Were Retaliation Claims Also Filed?
The final settlement order does not identify retaliation as a central claim in its description of Dale’s complaint.
That does not establish that no retaliation issue could ever have existed in another filing or separate dispute. It means only that the reviewed court order supports wage, overtime, classification, kickback, tip-sharing, and forced-tipping allegations—not a broad retaliation claim.
Why Should Employment and Harassment Claims Be Verified Separately?
Different employment claims arise under different statutes, require different elements of proof, and may follow different administrative or court procedures.
A wage-and-hour complaint under the FLSA should not automatically be described as a harassment case. Keeping the allegations separate prevents unrelated online claims from being presented as established facts about the litigation.
Who Was Eligible to Join the Original Lawsuit?
The case was initiated as an FLSA collective action on behalf of Dale and other workers alleged to be similarly situated.
Unlike a conventional Rule 23 class action, an FLSA collective generally requires eligible workers to affirmatively consent to participate. Several dancers filed consent notices during the Oz litigation.
Was the Case a Class Action or FLSA Collective Action?
It was filed as an FLSA collective action.
This distinction matters. A collective action under Section 216(b) uses an opt-in procedure, while many Rule 23 class actions generally bind qualifying class members unless they opt out after certification and notice.
The known Oz case ultimately resolved through individual settlement agreements rather than a publicly established class-wide settlement fund.
Which Workers Were Covered by the Case?
The complaint concerned exotic dancers who allegedly experienced similar classification and wage practices.
The final order identifies specific dancers who participated through the litigation process. It does not establish a settlement class encompassing every employee, bartender, server, entertainer, or other person who ever worked at the venue.
Did Workers Have to Opt In?
Yes. Participation in an FLSA collective action generally requires a worker to provide written consent to become a party.
The Oz docket reflects this process because additional dancers filed consent notices after Dale initiated the lawsuit.
That procedure differs materially from automatically being included in a certified Rule 23 class.
How Was the Case Resolved?
The participating parties eventually reached individual settlement agreements following arbitration-related proceedings.
The court reviewed those agreements because settlements resolving FLSA claims are subject to judicial scrutiny in this context. The judge considered whether the agreements represented a fair and reasonable resolution of the disputed wage claims.
On November 1, 2023, the court approved the settlements as modified and ordered the action dismissed with prejudice and closed.
Was the Lawsuit Dismissed, Settled, or Decided by the Court?
The lawsuit was settled and then dismissed with prejudice.
The court approved the parties’ settlement agreements after modifications discussed during oral argument. It did not conduct a trial and issue a verdict deciding that all of Dale’s allegations had been proven.
This distinction is important when describing the outcome accurately.
Was a Settlement Amount Made Public?
The court order states that the individual agreements provided specified payments to the participating plaintiffs and later notes that the agreed amounts had already been paid.
However, the publicly accessible order reviewed here does not state those individual dollar amounts. Accordingly, a specific overall settlement figure should not be presented as verified based solely on this order.
Did the Resolution Create a Claims Process?
The court order describes individual settlements with participating plaintiffs, not the creation of a general settlement fund or public claims program.
There is no indication in the final order of a claims administrator, universal claim form, public filing portal, or future claims deadline for former workers who were not parties to the settlements.
Is There an Active Class Action or Claims Process Against Oz Gentlemen’s Club in 2026?
The verified Dale case does not provide an active 2026 claims process. The federal court approved the participating plaintiffs’ settlements and closed the action in November 2023.
Searches for a “2026 Oz Gentlemen’s Club settlement” can produce pages describing payouts or eligibility. Those claims should be checked against an actual court docket or court-approved settlement website before personal information is submitted.
Is There a Current Court-Approved Class Action?
The known Dale litigation was an FLSA collective action and was dismissed with prejudice in 2023 after settlement.
The reviewed federal record does not establish a current court-approved class action arising from that case in 2026. A new action would require its own filing, docket, parties, and procedural history.
Is There an Official Settlement Claim Form?
No official public claim form is identified in the final Dale settlement order.
The resolution involved agreements with participating plaintiffs rather than a class-wide claims program. A legitimate new settlement process should be traceable to a court case, authorized administrator, or official notice containing verifiable case information.
Has a 2026 Claim Deadline Been Announced?
The reviewed federal court record does not announce a 2026 deadline for submitting claims under the Dale case.
The action was closed in November 2023. Any website advertising a current deadline should therefore be independently checked against court records before being treated as an official extension of this lawsuit.
How Can Workers Verify Whether a Claims Process Is Legitimate?
Workers can verify a purported settlement by checking:
- The full case name and docket number
- The court handling the case
- A court-approved settlement notice
- The identity of the claims administrator
- Filed settlement-approval documents
- Contact details for counsel identified in official records
Requests for fees, banking credentials, or sensitive information should not be trusted merely because a webpage uses the words “class action” or “settlement.”
What Should You Do If You Believe You’re Owed Wages by an Adult Entertainment Venue?
A worker who believes an adult entertainment venue failed to pay legally required wages should preserve evidence as early as possible.
Relevant records may include schedules, contracts, payment information, tip records, fees charged by the venue, and communications with managers. These documents can help establish both the working relationship and the amount of compensation involved.
What Employment and Payment Records Should You Keep?
Useful records can include:
- Shift schedules and personal time logs
- Pay statements and payment receipts
- Independent-contractor agreements
- Records of house or stage fees
- Tip-out records
- Tax documents
- Written workplace policies
- Communications about wages or scheduling
Even where an employer has recordkeeping obligations, maintaining personal copies can help reconstruct disputed hours and payments.
Can Work Schedules, Messages, and Bank Records Be Useful?
Yes. Those materials can provide evidence about when someone worked, what instructions management gave, and what payments were received.
Bank records may help establish payment patterns, while messages and schedules can help document working hours and the degree of control exercised over the work. Their evidentiary significance depends on the facts of the particular dispute.
When May a Wage and Hour Attorney Be Relevant?
An employment attorney may be relevant when a worker is uncertain about classification, unpaid overtime, minimum-wage calculations, deductions, tips, retaliation, or filing deadlines.
Legal advice can be particularly useful where records are incomplete or multiple federal and state wage laws may apply. Workers can also obtain general wage information from the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division.
How Do FLSA Collective Actions Differ from Class Action Lawsuits?
Although both procedures can involve groups of workers, an FLSA collective action and a Rule 23 class action operate differently.
The most significant practical difference is participation. FLSA workers generally affirmatively opt in, while Rule 23 class members can generally be included after certification unless they opt out.
Do Workers Have to Opt Into an FLSA Collective Action?
Yes. Under the FLSA collective-action framework, a worker generally must give written consent to become a party plaintiff.
That procedure explains why the Oz case docket contains consent filings from dancers who sought to participate after Dale filed the original lawsuit.
How Does a Rule 23 Class Action Work?
A Rule 23 class action requires the court to determine whether specific certification requirements have been satisfied.
If a damages class is certified, qualifying individuals generally receive notice and may have an opportunity to opt out. This differs from an FLSA collective, where a worker ordinarily must affirmatively opt in to participate.
Can a Lawsuit Include Both Federal and State Wage Claims?
Yes. Depending on the facts and jurisdiction, litigation can combine federal FLSA claims with related state wage-and-hour causes of action.
In Dale, the court required the settlement releases to be narrowed so that they applied to the plaintiffs’ FLSA claims and related state wage-and-hour claims rather than broadly releasing unrelated legal rights.
What Is the Statute of Limitations for Wage Theft Claims?
Wage claims are subject to filing deadlines, and workers should not assume that an old lawsuit automatically preserves their individual rights.
Federal and state claims can also have different limitation periods. The applicable deadline depends on the legal theory, dates of alleged violations, and jurisdiction.
What Is the FLSA Statute of Limitations?
Under federal law, an FLSA action for unpaid minimum wages or overtime generally must be commenced within two years after the claim accrues.
The limitations period is set out in 29 U.S.C. § 255.
Because wage violations can involve multiple pay periods, calculating the deadline may require reviewing the dates of individual alleged violations.
How Does a Willful FLSA Violation Affect the Filing Period?
The FLSA provides a three-year limitations period for a cause of action arising from a willful violation rather than the ordinary two-year period.
Whether conduct qualifies as willful is a legal and factual question. A worker should not automatically assume that the longer limitations period applies.
Can State Wage Laws Have Different Deadlines?
Yes. State wage laws can establish different filing periods, wage standards, remedies, and procedural requirements.
The federal FLSA limitations period therefore should not automatically be used as the deadline for every possible state-law wage claim. The relevant jurisdiction and type of claim must be considered separately.
What Is the Current Status of the Oz Gentlemen’s Club Case in 2026?
The documented Dale case is closed.
On November 1, 2023, the federal court approved the settlement agreements as modified, directed the clerk to dismiss the action with prejudice, and ordered the case closed.
That is the clearest verified status of the litigation underlying many searches for the Oz Gentlemen’s Club lawsuit.
Is the Original Case Still Pending?
No. The original federal case is not pending.
The final order expressly directed dismissal with prejudice and closure of the case on November 1, 2023.
A dismissal with prejudice generally ends the particular claims resolved in that action rather than leaving the lawsuit open for continuing litigation.
Have Any New Oz Gentlemen’s Club Cases Been Filed?
The reviewed materials do not establish a new 2026 wage class or collective action replacing the closed Dale case.
That does not mean litigation involving similarly named businesses could never exist. Any claimed new case should be verified using its parties, court, filing date, and docket number rather than assumed to be a continuation of Dale.
Is There a Verified Settlement or Payout in 2026?
The verified settlement occurred in connection with the earlier litigation, and the court stated in 2023 that the agreed settlement amounts had already been paid to the plaintiffs.
The reviewed record does not establish a new public 2026 payout program, payout date, or settlement fund for former Oz workers generally.
How to Protect Your Rights If You Work in the Adult Entertainment Industry
Workers in adult entertainment may encounter complicated questions involving employee classification, tips, fees, minimum wages, overtime, and written contractor agreements.
Keeping independent records can be especially useful when compensation comes from multiple sources or when the business classifies performers as contractors.
Keep Records of Hours, Fees, Tips, and Payments
Maintain a personal record of when each shift begins and ends, along with payments, tips, mandatory fees, deductions, and tip-outs.
The Department of Labor requires covered employers to maintain specific wage-and-hour records for nonexempt employees, but a worker’s own records can provide additional documentation if a dispute later develops.
Review Any Independent Contractor Agreement You Signed
Keep a complete copy of any contractor agreement and review what it says about schedules, fees, compensation, rules, termination, and control over the work.
Remember that the contract’s title is not necessarily conclusive under the FLSA. Federal classification analysis considers the economic realities of the overall working relationship.
Document Workplace Complaints and Communications
Preserve emails, text messages, scheduling messages, written complaints, policy documents, and relevant responses from management.
Contemporaneous records can make it easier to establish when a concern arose, who was notified, and what happened afterward.
Understand the Difference Between Contractor and Employee Status
Employees and independent contractors are treated differently under federal wage law.
The Department of Labor explains that an employee is generally economically dependent on an employer for work, while an independent contractor is in business for themselves. The entire economic relationship must be considered rather than relying solely on a contractual label.
Oz Gentlemen’s Club Lawsuit Settlement
A settlement was reached in the documented federal case, but it should not be confused with an open class-wide compensation program.
The court reviewed individual agreements resolving the participating plaintiffs’ FLSA disputes. After modifying the scope of the releases, the court approved the agreements and dismissed the action.
Was a Settlement Reached?
Yes. The participating plaintiffs and defendants reached negotiated settlement agreements.
The federal judge determined that the agreements, as modified during oral argument, could be approved as a fair and reasonable resolution of the disputed FLSA claims.
Settlement did not constitute a trial finding that every allegation against the defendants was proven.
How Much Was the Settlement?
The final order states that specified amounts were provided under the individual settlement agreements and confirms that the agreed amounts had already been paid.
However, the order reviewed here does not publish a single verified total settlement figure. It would therefore be inappropriate to assign a specific dollar value to the overall Oz settlement without supporting settlement documents.
Is There a Settlement Fund for Former Workers?
The final court order does not establish a general fund for all former Oz workers.
Instead, it describes individual agreements involving participating plaintiffs. No court-approved public claims process, administrator, or open settlement fund for former workers generally is identified in that order.
Oz Gentlemen’s Club Lawsuit Payout
Searches for an Oz Gentlemen’s Club lawsuit payout can create the impression that a new compensation program exists in 2026.
The documented court history supports a narrower conclusion: participating plaintiffs reached individual settlements, and the court stated in November 2023 that the agreed amounts had already been paid.
Is There a Payout Available in 2026?
No verified public 2026 payout program is established by the Dale court record reviewed for this article.
The settlement payments discussed in the federal order related to participating plaintiffs in the earlier case. The order does not establish an open compensation portal for former workers in 2026.
Who Could Be Eligible for Compensation?
In the original litigation, compensation resulted from individual settlements involving workers who had participated in the FLSA dispute.
A former worker who was not part of that litigation should not assume eligibility for those settlements. Whether that person has a separate wage claim depends on employment circumstances, alleged violations, applicable law, and filing deadlines.
Has a Payout Date Been Announced?
There is no verified 2026 payout date in the final federal order.
In fact, when approving the settlements in November 2023, the court noted that the agreed settlement amounts had already been paid to the plaintiffs.
Claims of a new payout date should therefore be verified through official court documents.
Read: Hairitage Shampoo Lawsuit
Read: Netflix Class Action Lawsuit
Read: Rael Tampons Lawsuit
Read: Jake Paul Lawsuit
Read: Immuno 150 Lawsuit
Read: Chobani Lawsuit
Read: United Settlement
Frequently Asked Questions
What was the Oz Gentlemen’s Club lawsuit about?
It was an FLSA wage case alleging dancer misclassification, unpaid minimum and overtime wages, and improper kickback, tip-sharing, and forced-tipping practices.
Who sued Oz Gentlemen’s Club?
Destinee Dale initiated the federal lawsuit in September 2021 against Gulf Coast Holdings, LLC d/b/a Oz’s Gentlemen’s Club and owner Paul Scagnelli.
Were dancers classified as independent contractors?
Dale alleged that dancers were classified as independent contractors when they should have received employee protections under the FLSA. The case settled without a liability verdict.
Did the lawsuit involve unpaid wages?
Yes. The complaint included allegations of unpaid minimum wages and overtime, along with disputed practices involving tips, kickbacks, and forced tipping.
Was Oz Gentlemen’s Club accused of FLSA violations?
Yes. Plaintiffs alleged violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Those allegations were resolved through settlement rather than proven through a final trial judgment.
Was there a sexual harassment claim?
The reviewed federal settlement order does not identify sexual harassment as a claim. Its description of the case focuses on wage, classification, overtime, and tip-related allegations.
Final Thoughts
The Oz Gentlemen’s Club lawsuit was a real federal wage-and-hour case, but its verified history differs from claims suggesting that a broad class action or new payout program remains open in 2026. Destinee Dale filed the FLSA collective action in 2021, alleging dancer misclassification, unpaid minimum and overtime wages, and improper tip-related practices.
The parties ultimately resolved the disputed claims through settlement. On November 1, 2023, the federal court approved the agreements as modified, dismissed the action with prejudice, and closed the case. The settlement did not constitute a trial finding that every allegation was proven.
Former workers who believe they have separate unpaid-wage claims should focus on their own employment records and applicable filing deadlines. Any advertised 2026 claim form, settlement fund, deadline, or payout should be independently verified against official court records before relying on it.
